Thank you to everyone who has contacted us with messages of support. We’ve been truly overwhelmed by the response to the news that as part of the NHS 10-Year Plan Healthwatch is set to be abolished.

So many of you have told us how concerned you are that there will no longer be a local, independent voice representing and supporting patients and people who draw on social care, their families and carers.

We want to reassure you that, even though the Healthwatch name will go, we are all committed to doing the very best we can for our communities and under-represented groups, now, and in the future.

The 10-year Health Plan acknowledges that “there needs to be a greater emphasis placed on the patient voice” but also, that “The problem is that the NHS doesn’t listen well enough”.

Healthwatch is described in the report by Dr Dash in the following terms: “Since 2013, Healthwatch has made a significant impact, aiding over a million people annually to voice their concerns and access advice.”

We are aware that a national petition has been created asking the government to:

  • Invest in and strengthen independent public voice.
  • Engage with local Healthwatch leaders and the public to co-design a future that puts people first.
  • Recognise the role independent voice can play in supporting the delivery of the NHS 10 Year Plan – by providing constructive challenge and supporting coproduction, particularly with those communities facing the greatest health and care needs.

The petition is here: Review decision to abolish independent local Healthwatch – Petitions

If this matters to you, please feel free to sign and share it.

People need to have a say in the future of health and care and we believe that voice must be independent.

Thank you again for supporting us. We’re grateful to have your support as we work through these changes together.

This summer, parents and carers are being encouraged not to add alcohol to the mix to protect children from risk.

Evidence is clear now that introducing children to alcohol – especially before 15 – can:

  • Harm developing bodies and brains
  • Worsen any feelings of low mood or depression
  • Put their safety at risk
  • Open the door to more regular teenage drinking and heavier drinking as adults

Alcohol is a group one carcinogen[i] and a direct cause of seven types of cancer, including bowel and breast cancer[ii]. Alcohol is driving nearly one million hospital admissions a year among adults from heart disease, mental health and behavioural disorders due to alcohol, cancer and liver disease.

Alcohol use can also increase the risk of children becoming involved in risky situations, such as violence and disorder, drug and tobacco use and unsafe sex.

Chief Medical Officer Guidance is that no alcohol under 18 is the healthiest and safest option but if children do drink, it should not be before the age of 15. If children aged 15-17 do drink it should only be in a supervised environment, and no more than once a week.

Although deaths from alcohol are at record level, more young people and adults are now choosing not to drink for better physical and mental health.

Susan Taylor, Head of Alcohol Policy for Balance, said: “Every parent and carer wants the best for their child. But alcohol use during teenage years can harm physical health and mental health.

“The alcohol industry has long promoted alcohol as a normal part of a happy, successful life but in reality, too many adults and children are ending up in hospital, in A&E or with real problems in their lives because of alcohol.

“Hospitals are now seeing people at a younger age with alcohol-related conditions such as liver disease. Alcohol intake can catch up with people much sooner than we sometimes think.

“The longer we can delay drinking alcohol in the lives of our children, the better. The younger they drink, the more likely they will develop a taste for it and encounter all the risks.”

The law is clear that buying alcohol under 18 or selling it to children under 18 is illegal. Supplying children with alcohol undermines these important age of sale laws which are there to protect both children and local communities.

Information for parents and a FREE guide about talking to children about alcohol is available at Whatstheharm.co.uk

Watch the campaign film:

[i] https://www.who.int/europe/news/item/04-01-2023-no-level-of-alcohol-consumption-is-safe-for-our-health

[ii] https://www.ndph.ox.ac.uk/news/new-genetic-study-confirms-that-alcohol-is-a-direct-cause-of-cancer

The new service offers women more choice about where and how they access the contraception.

All pharmacies offer walk-in appointments, with no need to book in advance, and consultations are carried out in private with a trained pharmacist. Pharmacists can help whether someone is starting the pill for the first time or continuing an existing prescription.

A yearly check-up will take place, usually when returning for the next supply.

The service is free and confidential for everyone, including those under 16. Personal information will not be shared unless there is a serious concern for safety or wellbeing.

Learn more and find your nearest participating pharmacy here:
Find a pharmacy offering the contraceptive pill

Watch this short film about the new service:

Better for you than smoking? More dangerous for your health than cigarettes? Or do you just not know?

The Public Health team at South Tyneside Council has launched a new online survey to try and find out more about what young people in the borough think about vaping.

It is estimated that 5% of teenagers in the North-East regularly use e-cigarettes, 15% higher than the national average. Girls are more likely to vape in the region, with 7% regularly vaping, compared to 4% of boys.

Youth vaping is on the rise too; recent research has shown that the proportion of 11 to 17-year-old e-cigarette users doubled from 3.3% in 2021 to 7.6% in 2023 nationally.

Read an article about this here: https://www.shieldsgazette.com/news/north-east-among-top-uk-hotspots-for-youth-vaping-according-to-data-4525429

The short questionnaire will only take a few minutes to complete and can be found here.

Please take part and help the team improve information for young people about the dangers of vaping.

As the NHS looks to a more digital future, healthcare leaders at South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust say they are already leading the way.

The trust is using Robotic Process Automation (RPA) software robots, known as ‘digital workers’ by their fellow NHS colleagues, to handle referrals made by GPs more efficiently.
The software automates repetitive, digital tasks which have previously taken people lots of time.
Now, following its launch, the project has become an international award winner. It has collected a Regional All-Star title in the Rising Star category in the SS&C Blue Prism Customer Excellence Awards 2025.
Every year, STSFT receives more than 136,000 referrals for people who need investigations or an outpatient appointment. This includes patients being seen both for routine care, and for suspected cancer.
Since bringing in its digital workers, the trust has saved more than 8,000 hours of staff time. This has greatly helped to improve staff morale and job satisfaction whilst also speeding up access to care.
Previously, it could take up to 10 minutes for a member of staff register a referral. This now takes just four minutes, as the digital workers can work overnight, when its systems are not as busy.
Referrals are now available for review by clinical teams within 48 hours of being made, and in many cases, within 24 hours. Referrals for suspected cancer diagnoses are also prioritised.
The digital workers also book patients for lung cancer screening tests as part of the national NHS screening prevention programme.
This invites 55 to 74-year-olds who are smokers or formerly smoked to be screened, as they are most likely to develop the disease in their lungs.
Across Sunderland and South Tyneside there are around 60,000 people eligible for a lung check. Now that a digital worker undertakes this work, around 2,000 people are being booked in each month.
The trust’s digital workers can each cover the workload of three administration roles, but they have not taken the jobs of any NHS staff.
Instead, the technology has freed up time for human employees to focus on more complex tasks such as talking to patients to organise other parts of their care.
The digital workers can also work around the clock. Because they never tire like humans, the digital workers do not make mistakes.
Michael Forrest, Outpatient Access and Booking Manager, is part of the trust’s team who worked alongside partners e18 Innovation and SS&C Blue Prism to introduce the digital workers.
He said: “We’re delighted about how the digital workers are making a difference so far by helping us to see patients sooner and reducing risk to them.
“It’s especially important for people to get answers quickly if they are waiting to find out if they have cancer or not, and to get an appointment when they are waiting for treatment to start.
“It’s also helped the team, because it’s eased the stress of having that backlog of patients and knowing people are now being seen sooner.
“Looking after our team is so important. They’re now able to concentrate on more fulfilling, interesting work, because they’re not doing these labour-intensive, administrative tasks.”
Helen Bone, Lung Cancer Screening Programme Manager for the trust, added: “Our admin team can now focus on other key aspects of the Lung Screening Pathway.
“It has saved us hours of time each week and the positive impact cannot be underestimated.”
Vicky Mitchell, Executive Director of Planning and Business Development, said: “Using robotic automation and artificial intelligence is a key part of our digital strategy for the Trust and will be a key to everything we do for the future.
“The newly published NHS 10 Year Health Plan focusses on how we need to use digital solutions much more. Our first digital workers here at STSFT are already showing the productivity and efficiency gains we can make.
“Using this technology has helped plug gaps in our workforce, while looking after our fantastic admin team, who are working hard to make sure we see patients as quickly as we can.
“We are now looking at where we can roll out more automated processes in other parts of our outpatient services and building on the success of the digital workers in our scheduling teams.”
Photo:

Rebecca Dempster, Directorate Manager for Outpatients and Clinical Administration, Olive Williams, Electronic Referrals System Manager, Michael Forrest, Outpatient Access and Booking Manager, Vicky Mitchell, Executive Director of Planning and Business Development, Louise Gustavson, Professional Services (EMEA) Head of Healthcare business for SS&C Blue Prism and Graeme Miller, Business Change Manager for the Trust.

Evidence suggests that transgender and non-binary people often experience poorer health outcomes than the general population. But what barriers do they face to high-quality care? And what would remove those barriers?

In Healthwatch’s latest research, we focused on trans and non-binary people’s experiences with GPs – often the gateway to the healthcare system – to learn some of the answers to those questions.

People told us about administrative hurdles and harmful assumptions about their experiences. The impact of poor care could be serious, with over half of respondents to our self-selecting survey, almost 1,400 people, only slightly confident or not at all confident about using their GP.

But people also shared stories of good care, in which staff treated them with respect and compassion, and took the time to understand the care they needed.

By following our recommendations, GP practices and healthcare decision-makers can take important steps towards ensuring good quality care is a reality for all.

What did people share about their experiences?

Trans and non-binary people can have negative experiences at the GP front door.

They may risk being outed or made to feel uncomfortable when they book, check in for, or are called in for appointments. Nearly a quarter of those who responded to our survey disagreed that GP receptionists treated them with respect.

They face administrative hurdles if they want to change their name, pronouns or gender markers on their GP record.

Nearly 30% of those who had changed their gender marker said they had lost access to their previous NHS record. There were disruptions to prescriptions, which 16% had experienced, and 18% were misgendered in NHS written communications. Changing gender markers also meant people risked making it harder to access to sex-specific care, such as cervical screening. Over one in five respondents (21%) who’d changed their gender marker said the NHS stopped offering them this sort of care.

They may have lower satisfaction with GP care than the general population.

Just over half (53%) of people answering our survey rated their GP as good or very good for the general care services they had sought. This is lower than the proportion of trans and non-binary respondents (68%) and overall respondents (74%) responding positively to a similar question in the most recent national GP Patient Survey. Less than a third of respondents (32%) rated their gender-affirming care from their GP as good or very good.

They experience problems accessing gender-affirming care via their GP due to different interpretations of various guidelines.

Less than a third of respondents who had tried to access hormone replacement therapy (HRT) via their GP told us they hadn’t experienced any delays, stops, or interruptions.

What would improve GP care?

Trans and non-binary people must be treated by their GP surgeries with respect, dignity and privacy, and without discrimination, in accordance with their rights.

GP surgeries should ensure staff understand and know how to act in accordance with relevant legislation, and that all patients feel welcomed and respected.

Trans and non-binary people should be protected from a loss of sex-specific healthcare (such as invitations for screening) if they change their gender.

The practice of giving people a new GP record and NHS number when people change their gender marker should end. Instead, a single NHS record should include details of both biological sex and any change to gender identity. This should be done in a way that ensures privacy, dignity and respect, and allows clinicians to provide the right clinical care. The Department of Health and Social Care should also improve IT and screening systems to ensure trans and non-binary people don’t miss out on sex-based healthcare.

The Government should develop a new LGBT+ strategy.

This should include steps to address the holistic needs of trans and non-binary adults. It should provide clarity on shared care arrangements and bridging prescriptions, and take action to cut long wait lists for gender dysphoria clinics and support people while they wait.

Healthwatch South Tyneside was one of ten local Healthwatch to help gather responses for the Healthwatch England report and 1,393 people aged 18+ who identified as trans, non-binary or another diverse gender identity, or considered themselves to a have a trans history, took part.

Download the report

Interested in learning more? You can download the full report below. If you require this report in a different format, please contact us by emailing enquiries@healthwatch.co.uk or calling us on 03000 683 000.

What trans and non-binary people told us about GP care

Latest news

Read more about Help others understand health advice and receive a £25 voucher

21.04.2026

Help others understand health advice and receive a £25 voucher

Read more about Tell us about your experience of hospital discharge

20.04.2026

Tell us about your experience of hospital discharge

Read more about Athletics legend Steve Cram inspires NHS staff to get active

16.04.2026

Athletics legend Steve Cram inspires NHS staff to get active

Read more about Bereaved families invited to take part in new research study

08.04.2026

Bereaved families invited to take part in new research study

Read more about New mental health support service for LGBTQ+ young people aged 11–25

08.04.2026

New mental health support service for LGBTQ+ young people aged 11–25

Read more about Young people waiting up to two years for mental health support

07.04.2026

Young people waiting up to two years for mental health support

Quick online NHS services